X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-help-bounces using -f Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 15:53:23 -0400 Message-Id: <201404181953.s3IJrNET017422@envy.delorie.com> From: DJ Delorie To: geda-help AT delorie DOT com In-reply-to: (message from Cyrus Vatan on Fri, 18 Apr 2014 13:23:22 -0400) Subject: Re: [geda-help] Alphanumeric pins a lie? References: <1397836799 DOT 937 DOT 5 DOT camel AT AMD64X2 DOT fritz DOT box> <1397839098 DOT 937 DOT 6 DOT camel AT AMD64X2 DOT fritz DOT box> Reply-To: geda-help AT delorie DOT com > I assumed the pin seq attribute drove which pin would be mapped when > they were letters. The pinseq attribute is used primarily for the simulators, and is ignored by PCB. IIRC the only effect it has on the netlist is that it determines what order the pins are scanned for netlisting. > although i am suprised there is no error when there is a mismatch between > sym and footprint pins. Did you check the Messages window? Note that the *only* connection between the symbol and the footprint is the netlist, so any mismatch would show up as a netlist error. Also, there's no rule that says there has to be a perfect match between symbols and footprints. A footprint might have extra pins that aren't mentioned in the schematic.