X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-help-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-help AT delorie DOT com Message-ID: <5348B7CE.1070107@mochima.com> Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 23:49:34 -0400 From: Carlos Moreno User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: geda-help AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-help] Having some trouble again! References: <533F89FE DOT 2060808 AT mochima DOT com> <534000E2 DOT 5080703 AT mochima DOT com> <5342AF6B DOT 6010405 AT mochima DOT com> <53445BD8 DOT 4070505 AT mochima DOT com> <53452A49 DOT 8000701 AT mochima DOT com> <20140409114728 DOT GA2172 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <5348800F DOT 3070500 AT mochima DOT com> <201404112358 DOT s3BNwoEw009040 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <5348973D DOT 9020603 AT mochima DOT com> <201404120135 DOT s3C1ZVgH012034 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> In-Reply-To: <201404120135.s3C1ZVgH012034@envy.delorie.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Added-Header: Reply-To: geda-help AT delorie DOT com On 14-04-11 09:35 PM, DJ Delorie wrote: > Also, do not end your refdes with a lower case letter. PCB ignores those. Bingo!! That was the problem --- I just changed the name Qmult to Q3, and the thing works like a charm now!! Thanks for that tip!! I would, however, claim that this actually is a "bug" (we could call it a "misfeature") in the functionality! If you're one of the developers (or in any case, for the developers who are reading this), you should do something about it --- if using lowercase is not acceptable, fine; but the software is silently not doing anything and reporting error messages that pins are missing and nets are shorted when the cause is that a refdes contains lowercase letters. Actually, scratch that --- if anything, my suggestion / feature- request would be that lowercase letters should be acceptable; I mean, they sort of give a subscript/subindex look to the symbol name, which can be good. Ideally, if one could use subscript and have the thing *really* show as a subscript (a la LaTeX), that would be fantastic. For the PCB silk, though, it may be a problem --- letters too small (or in any case lines too thin for the characters) may be rejected by manufacturers. But still --- at least for the schematic and maybe as markers in PCB Designer (even if they don't show like that in the silk), symbols with subscripts would be *great*, I think. Putting all that aside --- again, thank you for helping me figure out the problem!! Cheers, Carlos --