X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,RP_MATCHES_RCVD
	autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2
Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2017 12:53:03 +0300
Message-Id: <83poa0vc00.fsf@gnu.org>
From: "Eli Zaretskii (eliz AT gnu DOT org) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <or7gpa$jti$1@gioia.aioe.org> (message from Rod Pemberton on Fri,
	6 Oct 2017 05:02:47 -0400)
Subject: Re: DOSBox?
References: <or6bl4$pdo$1 AT gioia DOT aioe DOT org>
 <xnshexxjpr DOT fsf AT delorie DOT com> <or7gpa$jti$1 AT gioia DOT aioe DOT org>
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: Rod Pemberton <EmailNullFile AT voenflacbe DOT cpm>
> Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2017 05:02:47 -0400
> 
> I was very polite and civil.

No, you were not, not by any reasonable measure.  Accusing someone in
lying just because they disagree with you in their interpretation of
etiquette rules is hardly a polite behavior.

> You took offense to it

So would I.  And so would any reasonable person, just ask around if
you want an independent second opinion.