From: Charles Sandmann Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: RHIDE 1.5 Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 09:56:25 CST Organization: Rice University, Houston TX Lines: 15 Message-ID: <3e5257a9.sandmann@clio.rice.edu> References: <3E524A35 DOT 53318A96 AT yahoo DOT com> NNTP-Posting-Host: clio.rice.edu X-Trace: joe.rice.edu 1045584048 15914 128.42.105.3 (18 Feb 2003 16:00:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse AT rice DOT edu NNTP-Posting-Date: 18 Feb 2003 16:00:48 GMT X-NewsEditor: ED-1.5.9 To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com > > The main differences are, that I have built it using gcc 2.95.3 > > and using gdb 5.3. > > I used gcc 2.95.3, because the built with gcc 3.2 was very unstable > > (probably, because the core DJGPP was not bult with gcc 3.2). > However my main system, for gpc and gcc, is gcc 3.2.1. and gdb > 5.3. So I probably should not confuse things by backtracking. The GCC version the application was built with should not matter. V2.03 (and refresh) were built with GCC 2.8.1, many of the Simtel binaries (like make) were built with GCC 2.7.x, 2.8.x or 2.9.x Unless you are using an entire CVS/test system from Andrew's build, you already have mixed version binaries.