Message-ID: <3E524A35.53318A96@yahoo.com>
From: CBFalconer <cbfalconer AT yahoo DOT com>
Organization: Ched Research
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: RHIDE 1.5
References: <200302172104 DOT h1HL4Gk07257 AT delorie DOT com> <3E51B843 DOT A4C8A325 AT yahoo DOT com> <3E51E668 DOT 6060909 AT gmx DOT net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 24
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 15:20:04 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.90.181.46
X-Complaints-To: abuse AT worldnet DOT att DOT net
X-Trace: bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net 1045581604 12.90.181.46 (Tue, 18 Feb 2003 15:20:04 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 15:20:04 GMT
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Robert Hoehne wrote:
> CBFalconer schrieb:
> 
> > I have here a RHIDE 1.5, 2002-08-29, which I downloaded from
> > somewhere a while ago.  Is this noticeably (or even subtly)
> > different, i.e. should I replace it?
> 
> What you have is an aplha release made by Andris. The release
> from me is not noticable different (mayba some minor bugs fixed).
> The main differences are, that I have built it using gcc 2.95.3
> and using gdb 5.3.
> 
> I used gcc 2.95.3, because the built with gcc 3.2 was very unstable
> (probably, because the core DJGPP was not bult with gcc 3.2).

However my main system, for gpc and gcc, is gcc 3.2.1. and gdb
5.3.  So I probably should not confuse things by backtracking.

-- 
Chuck F (cbfalconer AT yahoo DOT com) (cbfalconer AT worldnet DOT att DOT net)
   Available for consulting/temporary embedded and systems.
   <http://cbfalconer.home.att.net>  USE worldnet address!