From: JMK <jeffrey DOT m DOT klopotic AT lmco DOT nospam DOT com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: whats wrong with my compiler
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 12:18:49 -0800
Organization: Lockheed Martin Corporation
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <3DD556A9.4D37297B@lmco.nospam.com>
References: <20021115043144 DOT 31342 DOT qmail AT web13005 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.197.49.226
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Thomas,

It just pains me to see more than a thousand dollars in books go to
waste so quickly ;-).

It is so very important to tell people that C++ changes so often and so
quickly that they need to be sure that they indeed do have the latest
compiler and software.  

But at the same time is important to tell them that it is possible to
get the older material to compile and how to do it.  

Both these items, the rapidity of material change to the language, and
the method of which to compile the older code should be addressed in an
answer on why legacy code doesn't work.

Now the question is, did Shaymaa's code recompile with changing iostream
to iostream.h?  If not, what compiler switch should he use on gcc?

Jeff

These thoughts are mine alone but may be shared by others.