From: Hans-Bernhard Broeker Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: Help in my codes. Date: 19 Sep 2002 11:55:44 GMT Organization: Aachen University of Technology (RWTH) Lines: 27 Message-ID: References: <3voboug43iagagl91bk5o4buuu2is8fava AT 4ax DOT com> NNTP-Posting-Host: acp3bf.physik.rwth-aachen.de X-Trace: nets3.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE 1032436544 25959 137.226.32.75 (19 Sep 2002 11:55:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse AT rwth-aachen DOT de NNTP-Posting-Date: 19 Sep 2002 11:55:44 GMT Originator: broeker@ To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Kim Seng wrote: >> That's clear indication that this code is indeed assuming an >> old-fashioned, no longer correct version of the C++ language. > mmh, does that I'm on the wrong track. A bit confused now on which one is > the standard. > #include > using namespace std; That's the new, officially standardized way. But to work around your naming conflicts regarding the variable "count", it might be better to avoid "using namespace std;" and instead salt your code with explicit "std::" prefixes where necessary. > #include That's the older way. As of version 3.0 and later, GCC will complain about this, warning you about "deprecated usage". >> The one by Stroustrup should be up to date, e.g. > Do you have any good book to introduce to this newbie? :p No, because I don't actively do C++ myself, but if I did, I'd be using "the real thing", i.e. Stroustrup. -- Hans-Bernhard Broeker (broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de) Even if all the snow were burnt, ashes would remain.