From: haleyjd AT NOSPAM DOT hotmail DOT com (James Haley)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Question about ISO C99 and GCC
Date: 07 Sep 2002 03:24:35 GMT
Organization: Concentric Internet Services
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <3d7970de.179693669@news.concentric.net>
References: <3d71a27d DOT 23705885 AT news DOT nzwide DOT ihug DOT co DOT nz> <3d794cbc DOT 170442372 AT news DOT concentric DOT net> <200209070110 DOT g871AiW02735 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.2.0.207
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.11/32.235
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

So, now that I better understand the source of this requirement, I
have one question.  Is it the position of the GCC guys that all code
to be compiled under GCC should be ISO C99 compliant? I was totally
unaware of the addition of the new requirement in this standard, as
I'm sure you ascertained.

If this is the case, then it'll be much easier for me now to make sure
all my source is ISO C99 compliant rather than being revisionist and
fixing one issue at a time when it arises :->

As soon as I get the chance I will upgrade to the newest version of
DJGPP (mine is a bit outdated) and see what I can do.

Again, sorry about my bad attitude earlier.  It was very
unprofessional of me.