From: Martin Steuer <martinSteuer AT gmx DOT de>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Inline Assembly and return value of a function
Date: 31 Jul 2002 17:43:00 GMT
Organization: No Organisation
Lines: 3
Message-ID: <Xns925CC89A68D12martinSteuergmxde@130.133.1.4>
References: <5 DOT 0 DOT 2 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20020731094743 DOT 009e3a20 AT pop DOT gmx DOT net> <ai8cod$7do$1 AT antares DOT lu DOT erisoft DOT se> <Xns925CC78F25EBAmartinSteuergmxde AT 130 DOT 133 DOT 1 DOT 4>
NNTP-Posting-Host: dialin-145-254-071-245.arcor-ip.net (145.254.71.245)
X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 1028137380 35507924 145.254.71.245 (16 [142788])
User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

I read Hans Bernhards post too late, this already explains it a bit. 
But I wonder why one would use a "0" constraint instead of a "1" 
constraint, because in this case the input is referenced as %1?