From: Hans-Bernhard Broeker <broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Flex/Byacc file naming question
Date: 28 May 2002 08:56:09 GMT
Organization: Aachen University of Technology (RWTH)
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <acvgn9$9u2$1@nets3.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE>
References: <3CF2C3DE DOT B8E4EB3A AT hfx DOT andara DOT com> <acvf4k$sjk$2 AT antares DOT lu DOT erisoft DOT se>
NNTP-Posting-Host: acp3bf.physik.rwth-aachen.de
X-Trace: nets3.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE 1022576168 10178 137.226.32.75 (28 May 2002 08:56:09 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse AT rwth-aachen DOT de
NNTP-Posting-Date: 28 May 2002 08:56:09 GMT
Originator: broeker@
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Martin Stromberg <eplmst AT lu DOT erisoft DOT se> wrote:

> Because Byacc isn't by GNU? Compare with what bison does.

Just to throw in a nitpick: strictly spoken, flex isn't GNU either.
It comes under the GPL, and it's supported to some extent by the GNU
people (i.e. it's in their 'non-GNU free software' listing), but
that's about it.
-- 
Hans-Bernhard Broeker (broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de)
Even if all the snow were burnt, ashes would remain.