X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mailnull set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f From: Hans-Bernhard Broeker Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: number version Date: 10 May 2002 14:20:06 GMT Organization: Aachen University of Technology (RWTH) Lines: 32 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: acp3bf.physik.rwth-aachen.de X-Trace: nets3.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE 1021040406 6246 137.226.32.75 (10 May 2002 14:20:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse AT rwth-aachen DOT de NNTP-Posting-Date: 10 May 2002 14:20:06 GMT Originator: broeker@ To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Antoine wrote: > In december 2001, I download with picker > djgpp, gcc, gpp, make, rhide etc....it was cool > What was the numbers version of them at this time? Pen down the package names listed by the zip picker, but without everything after the first number in the file name. Now go to the ftp server you selected via the zip picker, and look for packages with the same name, but a different set of digits. Select whichever is newest, from the FTP directory listing. That's not entirely foolproof, but for a rough idea, it should work. > the actual version doesn't work on my pc and are slowest. How does "Doesn't work" manifests itself? I.e. what exactly fails, and what are the symptoms? And what's your operating system? Windows 2000 and XP are known to need some special treatment. What did you change (in your hardware or OS installation) since that last time you downloaded DJGPP? What keeps you from just sticking with the installation you made back then? The only package known to be noticeably slower than its predecessors would be GCC itself. GCC version 3 is a major new version, and is known to consume considerably more resources, both in terms of memory and CPU time, than all earlier versions. -- Hans-Bernhard Broeker (broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de) Even if all the snow were burnt, ashes would remain.