X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mailnull set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: help with inline AT&T assembly
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2002 10:58:19 +0300
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <3CAAB61B.FC481AF4@is.elta.co.il>
References: <3CAA99CA DOT 33B1298D AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <20020403025837 DOT 19509 DOT 00001308 AT mb-cm DOT aol DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 192.116.55.139
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 1017820949 29114836 192.116.55.139 (16 [61365])
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; I)
X-Accept-Language: en
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Sterten wrote:
> 
> and then I had several errors , I don't like the AT&T-syntax.

Many people disagree with you (they don't like the Intel syntax).

> Here is , what finally worked but gave only a speed improvement
> of about 30% on my K6/2 :

As a rule of thumb, you shouldn't expect any speedups more than 30-50% from
going to assembly.  If you need a larger speedup, you should rethink your
algorithms.