X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mailnull set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2002 15:07:41 +0200
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Message-Id: <4727-Fri08Feb2002150740+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: emacs 21.2.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
In-reply-to: <0BA32251E589D2118EA60008C70DDCAB025F91A5@JNJFRISEXS1.eu.jnj.com>
	(CBARIBAU AT jnjfr DOT JNJ DOT com)
Subject: Re: Alignment problem
References:  <0BA32251E589D2118EA60008C70DDCAB025F91A5 AT JNJFRISEXS1 DOT eu DOT jnj DOT com>
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: "Baribaud, Christophe [JNJFR]" <CBARIBAU AT jnjfr DOT JNJ DOT com>
> Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 10:50:33 +0100 
> 
> >This has nothing to do with the compiler: malloc is implemented in
> >the library.
> 
> Yes, of course, but what I wanted to explain is that it is generally
> dangerous to assume that malloc returns aligned memory when writing
> portable code.

No, it isn't dangerous, since the standard requires malloc to behave
that way.