From: 99mca30 AT mailandnews DOT com (R. Rajesh Jeba Anbiah) Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.programmer,comp.os.msdos,comp.os.msdos.djgpp,comp.os.msdos.misc Subject: Re: Control timing Date: 28 Oct 2001 02:29:08 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Lines: 18 Message-ID: <8ea1626e.0110280229.68dc811b@posting.google.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 210.214.17.206 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1004264949 13213 127.0.0.1 (28 Oct 2001 10:29:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse AT google DOT com NNTP-Posting-Date: 28 Oct 2001 10:29:09 GMT To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com "Alexander Russell" wrote in message news:... > "jeffchan" wrote in message > news:bf50ce95 DOT 0110260054 DOT 1153f72a AT posting DOT google DOT com... > > Thanks your kindly information. > > > > I use this code and having modification to verify the performance when > > i make it faster. > > > > My testing is checking the reading of x after certain time. > > For 1kHz, that's okay. For 8kHz, the result is the same as 1kHz. > > AJR - I don't see an obvious problem. Are you running under DOS? If running > under a dos box in win9x the timing will not be exactly what you expect. Let me know the reason. -- Peace - The choice of the new generation.