From: jeffkhc AT netvigator DOT com (jeffchan) Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.programmer,comp.os.msdos,comp.os.msdos.djgpp,comp.os.msdos.misc Subject: Re: Control timing Date: 30 Oct 2001 17:11:57 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Lines: 26 Message-ID: References: <8ea1626e DOT 0110280229 DOT 68dc811b AT posting DOT google DOT com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 203.85.227.235 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1004490718 11088 127.0.0.1 (31 Oct 2001 01:11:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse AT google DOT com NNTP-Posting-Date: 31 Oct 2001 01:11:58 GMT To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Hi, That's mean i must install DOS on my PC. Can i use windows startup disk booting up, to make an environment as dos? Is that still same as dos box in win9x? And if the new_timer(void) routine is too much coding, it can't finish the job when the next interrupt came expected. Do i need to set some interrupt masking flags? How do i check the timing spent of this interrupt service routine? Jeff > > > AJR - I don't see an obvious problem. Are you running under DOS? If > running > > > under a dos box in win9x the timing will not be exactly what you expect. > > > > Let me know the reason. > > > Windows 9x grabs all the interrupts, and lets dos programms 'use' them at > random intervals. > > > -- > > Peace - The choice of the new generation.