From: Hans-Bernhard Broeker Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: Troll (was Re: Making C++ little easier to beginners...) Date: 19 Oct 2001 10:05:52 GMT Organization: Aachen University of Technology (RWTH) Lines: 32 Message-ID: <9qotu0$am4$1@nets3.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE> References: <9qmkrh$581$1 AT tron DOT sci DOT fi> <9qntqe$kd8$1 AT tron DOT sci DOT fi> NNTP-Posting-Host: acp3bf.physik.rwth-aachen.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: nets3.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE 1003485952 10948 137.226.32.75 (19 Oct 2001 10:05:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse AT rwth-aachen DOT de NNTP-Posting-Date: 19 Oct 2001 10:05:52 GMT Originator: broeker@ To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com In comp.os.msdos.djgpp Traveler wrote: > Yes, your right ! I shouldn´t use C. I use C++ instead :) Which doesn't change the issue in the slightest way --- C++ is exactly the same as C, in this regard. >> the point is, if you want a logical operation, use the logical operator. >> OTOH, if you want a bitwise operation, use the bitwise operator. > Also the point is that anybody whit the knowledge of Boolean algebra > knows that there really is no separate things like "bit" and > "logical" AND or "bit" and "logical" OR. Boolean algebra books know *nothing* about real-world programming languages. In particular, they know nothing about variables with more than a single bit in them, and that's why the need for the distinction between && and & doesn't arise for them. > Case is close... If any thing is closed, that would be your view of the world, shielding you from the apparently shocking perspective of learning something new, once in a while. Go away, troll. -- Hans-Bernhard Broeker (broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de) Even if all the snow were burnt, ashes would remain.