From: "Traveler" <traveler AT netti DOT fi>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Troll (was Re: Making C++ little easier to beginners...)
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 04:00:41 +0300
Organization: SAUNALAHDEN asiakas
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <9qntqe$kd8$1@tron.sci.fi>
References: <9qmkrh$581$1 AT tron DOT sci DOT fi> <Xns913E6449296FFASINANUNUR AT 132 DOT 236 DOT 56 DOT 8>
NNTP-Posting-Host: cmlvi.rdyn.saunalahti.fi
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: tron.sci.fi 1003453070 20904 195.197.136.56 (19 Oct 2001 00:57:50 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: newsmaster AT saunalahti DOT fi
NNTP-Posting-Date: 19 Oct 2001 00:57:50 GMT
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id f9J102R15155
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com


> This message is completely off-topic in this newsgroup. Further, what you 
> describe has already been tried by a whole bunch of hapless people and 
> rejected. If you want to use EQUAL for ==, then you should not be using C.
Yes, your right ! I shouldn´t use C. I use C++ instead :)

> 
> the point is, if you want a logical operation, use the logical operator. 
> OTOH, if you want a bitwise operation, use the bitwise operator.
Also the point is that anybody whit the knowledge of Boolean algebra knows that there really is no separate things like "bit" and "logical" AND or "bit" and "logical" OR.
Case is close...