From: "Traveler" <traveler AT netti DOT fi>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Making C++ little easier to beginners...
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 03:53:34 +0300
Organization: SAUNALAHDEN asiakas
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <9qntd3$k8s$1@tron.sci.fi>
References: <9qmkrh$581$1 AT tron DOT sci DOT fi> <38315c2d DOT 0110181039 DOT 29608661 AT posting DOT google DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: cmlvi.rdyn.saunalahti.fi
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: tron.sci.fi 1003452643 20764 195.197.136.56 (19 Oct 2001 00:50:43 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: newsmaster AT saunalahti DOT fi
NNTP-Posting-Date: 19 Oct 2001 00:50:43 GMT
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id f9J101t15150
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com


> > if(x == 10 && x == 10)        // Does this look scary or weird 
> > to you ?
> 
> No. It looks like exactly you are ANDing the result of x == 10 with
> the result of x == 10. I suppose that's a bit weird, but certainly not
> scary.
I believe that you allready noticed the error...

> That's enough! How do you suppose obfuscating the C++ language behind
> a set of dodgy preprocessor macros makes things easier for anybody,
> particularly beginners? In fact, don't answer that.
You answer to this instead : If you make 'NAND' operation ('Not And') witch is more easier way to do it ?

Traditional or with the use of this stuff ?

Also note that what I have done so far is to offer alternative to "bit" and "logical" operations.
I did not try to do some brain-damage things like defining '{' with BEGING and '}' with END like in Pascal...