Message-ID: <3BCF71D6.8954C73D@worldnet.att.net>
From: Les Cargill <lcargill AT worldnet DOT att DOT net>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Win98; I)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: `return' with no value, in function returning non-void (was Re: 
 Clearing screens)
References: <16a9b8d3 DOT 0110180325 DOT 4f2ff5e AT posting DOT google DOT com> <9qmfe4$iqt$1 AT nets3 DOT rz DOT RWTH-Aachen DOT DE> <9qmuod$fu2$1 AT cyan DOT nl DOT gxn DOT net> <Xns913E7D7DCC53AASINANUNUR AT 132 DOT 236 DOT 56 DOT 8> <9qn229$glu$1 AT cyan DOT nl DOT gxn DOT net> <9qn3hr$6pp$1 AT nets3 DOT rz DOT RWTH-Aachen DOT DE> <9qn4a1$he4$1 AT cyan DOT nl DOT gxn DOT net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 26
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 00:17:28 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.86.209.61
X-Complaints-To: abuse AT worldnet DOT att DOT net
X-Trace: bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net 1003450648 12.86.209.61 (Fri, 19 Oct 2001 00:17:28 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 00:17:28 GMT
Organization: AT&T Worldnet
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com



Bart van den Burg wrote:
> 
> also standard int's ?

There are no standard int-s. They're machine dependent. 

> Bart
> 
> "Hans-Bernhard Broeker" <broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de> wrote in message
> news:9qn3hr$6pp$1 AT nets3 DOT rz DOT RWTH-Aachen DOT DE...
> > Bart van den Burg <bart AT bart99 DOT tmfweb DOT nl> wrote:
> > > by the way
> > > the function returns a number larger than in integer can be:
> >
> > Nonsense. Integers can easily be larger then the 32767 which I guess
> > is the upper limit you have in mind --- welcome to the world outside
> > the tight limits of 16bitism :-)
> >
> > --
> > Hans-Bernhard Broeker (broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de)
> > Even if all the snow were burnt, ashes would remain.

--
http://home.att.net/~lcargill