From: "A. Sinan Unur" <asu1 AT cornell DOT edu>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: `return' with no value, in function returning non-void (was Re: Clearing screens)
Date: 18 Oct 2001 16:20:37 GMT
Organization: Cornell University
Lines: 27
Sender: asu1 AT cornell DOT invalid (on 128.253.251.163)
Message-ID: <Xns913E7D7DCC53AASINANUNUR@132.236.56.8>
References: <16a9b8d3 DOT 0110180325 DOT 4f2ff5e AT posting DOT google DOT com> <9qmfe4$iqt$1 AT nets3 DOT rz DOT RWTH-Aachen DOT DE> <9qmuod$fu2$1 AT cyan DOT nl DOT gxn DOT net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 128.253.251.163
X-Trace: news01.cit.cornell.edu 1003422037 21594 128.253.251.163 (18 Oct 2001 16:20:37 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet AT news01 DOT cit DOT cornell DOT edu
NNTP-Posting-Date: 18 Oct 2001 16:20:37 GMT
User-Agent: Xnews/4.06.22
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

"Bart van den Burg" <bart AT bart99 DOT tmfweb DOT nl> wrote in 
news:9qmuod$fu2$1 AT cyan DOT nl DOT gxn DOT net:

> is it a DJGPP WIN2k bug that an int function doesn't have to return
> anything?

Change the subject line when you change the topic of a thread.

Now, I am not sure what you mean. If you do the following:

/* i.c */
int blah(void)
{
  return;
}

C:\var>gcc -c i.c -Wall
i.c: In function `blah':
i.c:3: warning: `return' with no value, in function returning non-void

do you not get a warning under W2K?

Sinan.
-- 
--------------------------------
A. Sinan Unur
http://www.unur.com/