From: "Bart van den Burg" <bart AT bart99 DOT tmfweb DOT nl>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Clearing screens
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 18:10:09 +0200
Organization: XO Communications B.V.
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <9qmuod$fu2$1@cyan.nl.gxn.net>
References: <16a9b8d3 DOT 0110180325 DOT 4f2ff5e AT posting DOT google DOT com> <9qmfe4$iqt$1 AT nets3 DOT rz DOT RWTH-Aachen DOT DE>
NNTP-Posting-Host: asd-tel-ap02-d06-130.dial.freesurf.nl
X-Trace: cyan.nl.gxn.net 1003421261 16322 62.100.19.130 (18 Oct 2001 16:07:41 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse AT freesurf DOT nl
NNTP-Posting-Date: 18 Oct 2001 16:07:41 GMT
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

is it a DJGPP WIN2k bug that an int function doesn't have to return
anything?

Bart

"Hans-Bernhard Broeker" <broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de> wrote in message
news:9qmfe4$iqt$1 AT nets3 DOT rz DOT RWTH-Aachen DOT DE...
> jno <jno AT rocketmail DOT com> wrote:
> > Using djgpp for W2K -
>
> Bad idea right from the start, I suspect.  The gurus are still working
> rather hard to make DJGPP run correctly in a W2K environment.  Until
> they release their results, using DJGPP on W2K will continue hurt.
> Badly.
>
> > tried clrscr() (like in Turbo C) also system("cls") from process.h
> > but neither does it
>
> You really could be a bit more specific. *How* did they fail to "do
> it"?  Did you receive an error message, or just nothing cleared? Or a
> crash?
>
> --
> Hans-Bernhard Broeker (broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de)
> Even if all the snow were burnt, ashes would remain.