Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 17:57:44 +0200
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Message-Id: <3995-Tue16Oct2001175743+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
In-reply-to: <3BCC49EC.5FB4D8ED@inti.gov.ar> (message from salvador on Tue, 16
	Oct 2001 11:53:32 -0300)
Subject: Re: MAKEing Turbo Vision 1.1.3
References: <im4mstk71bb1ondv81goeqsededhsiqj0b AT 4ax DOT com> <3BCB274A DOT 34F2631 AT inti DOT gov DOT ar> <j0fnst84g4o75b64184kvs3dhlvg3j5gki AT 4ax DOT com> <3BCC49EC DOT 5FB4D8ED AT inti DOT gov DOT ar>
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 11:53:32 -0300
> From: salvador <salvador AT inti DOT gov DOT ar>
> 
> BTW: gcc 3.x is much more slower than previous versions and currently new
> packages are linked with the new gettext so be prepared for slower
> compilations and bigger files in the future.

How much slower is GCC 3.x as compared to previous versions?  I hear
figures like 30% slower; do you have similar measurements?

Also, I assume you mean that the compilation is slower, but not the
produced code.  Is that right?

TIA