From: Radical DOT NetSurfer AT delorie DOT com Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: MAKEing Turbo Vision 1.1.3 Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 00:54:10 -0400 Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com Message-ID: References: <3BCB274A DOT 34F2631 AT inti DOT gov DOT ar> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: newsabuse AT supernews DOT com Lines: 23 To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com I have come to the conclusion, that as far as I am concerned, given the issues with gettext(), _conio_gettext/Borland/Internalization issues, it absolutely is NOT worth my time and trouble to (re) install/modify all the things that have to be tampered with JUST to explore 'tvision113' !! So much "bloat" (eegads...the very thing we accuse Win9x to be so guilty of) is NOW occurring to my nice, well-balenced DJGPP installation... and I see no reason to disturb that balence for just ONE, quite minor curiousity.... (fortunately, I can always RESCUE my installation from both a Zippy-disk backup, and CD-RW backup.... WHEW!) ADD to that the fact that its wrap up around RH - IDE, which adds 1000% to the build time to the package, instead of the BLAZINGLY fast and simple, stand-alone and ordinary MAKEFILE approach !! Just what other packages out there, ACTUALLY fall into the same category as Tvision113... I think I might want to avoid them unless I see a __genuinely__ serious need to re-compile them. [[snipped-section]]