From: Hans-Bernhard Broeker <broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: solaris-to-dos cross-compiler
Date: 15 Oct 2001 16:49:42 GMT
Organization: Aachen University of Technology (RWTH)
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <9qf436$75k$1@nets3.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE>
References: <20011012122500 DOT A19892 AT kendall DOT sfbr DOT org> <3759-Fri12Oct2001211638+0200-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <20011015111934 DOT A23876 AT kendall DOT sfbr DOT org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: acp3bf.physik.rwth-aachen.de
X-Trace: nets3.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE 1003164582 7348 137.226.32.75 (15 Oct 2001 16:49:42 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse AT rwth-aachen DOT de
NNTP-Posting-Date: 15 Oct 2001 16:49:42 GMT
Originator: broeker@
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

JT Williams <jeffw AT darwin DOT sfbr DOT org> wrote:
> A bit of the output from `make' with `-v' is appended.  It seems that
> the cross-compiler is found, but the cross-binutils are not, probably
> because many of the executables have `-new' appended to their names:

That's not the problem. You're supposed to *install* the
cross-binutils into a place where the GCC configure step can find
them. Either manually, or via 'make install' --- your choice.  

The alternative is to merge the GCC and binutils source trees into a
single big one. The configure script in the toplevel directory will
then automatically tell GCC where to find the just-built new binutils.
The Cygnus docs call that a 'unified source tree', sometimes.
-- 
Hans-Bernhard Broeker (broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de)
Even if all the snow were burnt, ashes would remain.