From: "Bart van den Burg" <bart AT bart99 DOT tmfweb DOT nl>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: assembly
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 18:26:40 +0200
Organization: XO Communications B.V.
Lines: 32
Message-ID: <9qf2jk$2k7$1@cyan.nl.gxn.net>
References: <9qf07f$1t6$1 AT cyan DOT nl DOT gxn DOT net> <9qf1s1$51v$1 AT nets3 DOT rz DOT RWTH-Aachen DOT DE>
NNTP-Posting-Host: asd-tel-ap02-d01-184.dial.freesurf.nl
X-Trace: cyan.nl.gxn.net 1003163060 2695 62.100.14.184 (15 Oct 2001 16:24:20 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse AT freesurf DOT nl
NNTP-Posting-Date: 15 Oct 2001 16:24:20 GMT
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

uhm... yeah

how would I change to screen mode 13 with GCC then in asm?

Bart

"Hans-Bernhard Broeker" <broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de> wrote in message
news:9qf1s1$51v$1 AT nets3 DOT rz DOT RWTH-Aachen DOT DE...
> Bart van den Burg <bart AT bart99 DOT tmfweb DOT nl> wrote:
> [...]
>
> >  asm {
> >   mov ax, 0x13
> >   int 0x10
> >  }
>
> > what's wrong here?
>
> The asm syntax. This piece of source is not compatible with GCC ---
> it's meant for some other compiler's idea of how inline assembly
> should be written. Probably Borland's.
>
> Moreover, it's written in Intel-style assembly, rather than the AT&T
> style expected by GCC and its tools.
>
>
>
> --
> Hans-Bernhard Broeker (broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de)
> Even if all the snow were burnt, ashes would remain.