From: "A. Sinan Unur" <asu1 AT cornell DOT edu>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: printf  vs  stream IO
Date: 2 Oct 2001 23:38:35 GMT
Organization: Cornell University
Lines: 24
Sender: asu1 AT cornell DOT invalid (on slip-32-102-40-98.ny.us.prserv.net)
Message-ID: <Xns912EC7D2C2DC6ASINANUNUR@132.236.56.8>
References: <foubrto6s9c5nltt00ad6sg5pv70ppohvg AT 4ax DOT com> <3BB60BE8 DOT 2C5B9EA7 AT worldnet DOT att DOT net> <l45crt8tlkk7dcak95lvi00svsh3kt4kqv AT 4ax DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: slip-32-102-40-98.ny.us.prserv.net
X-Trace: news01.cit.cornell.edu 1002065915 15703 32.102.40.98 (2 Oct 2001 23:38:35 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet AT news01 DOT cit DOT cornell DOT edu
NNTP-Posting-Date: 2 Oct 2001 23:38:35 GMT
User-Agent: Xnews/4.06.22
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Radical NetSurfer wrote in
news:l45crt8tlkk7dcak95lvi00svsh3kt4kqv AT 4ax DOT com: 
> 
> char *strrev(const char *str) ; //use strdup !!
> 
> da solution...at least.... SHEESH PEOPLE!

not "da solution" but a solution. it depends on your requirements and 
whether you want to keep track of the memory allocated by strdup. you are 
making sure to check the return value of strdup right? you are remembering 
to free it, right?

also, i wish you would cut down on the sheeshes.

incidentally, strdup is not standard either.

and please don't remind me i have contradicted my wish of not posting on 
this topic again.

sinan.
-- 
--------------------------------
A. Sinan Unur
http://www.unur.com/