Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 21:23:52 +0300 From: "Eli Zaretskii" Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il To: Jason Green Message-Id: <9003-Sun16Sep2001212352+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 CC: djgpp AT delorie DOT com In-reply-to: (message from Jason Green on Sun, 16 Sep 2001 15:34:55 +0100) Subject: Re: Weekly Mini-FAQ post for DJGPP References: <200109100500 DOT BAA12378 AT delorie DOT com> <3BA371F0 DOT 2D0BEE68 AT yahoo DOT com> <1438-Sat15Sep2001190651+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > From: Jason Green > Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp > Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 15:34:55 +0100 > > > > binutils-2.11.2 bnu2112b.zip, bnu2112s.zip > > bison-1.29 bsn129b.zip, bsn129s.zip > > Timestamp and filesize should probably be listed too, to catch the cases > when a package is re-released under the same name. > > How about also prefixing each line with an asterix if the package is less > than a month old? FWIW, I don't see why is this necessary. SimTel.NET has the 00_index.txt files, precisely for this purpose.