Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2001 19:06:52 +0300
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: CBFalconer <cbfalconer AT yahoo DOT com>
Message-Id: <1438-Sat15Sep2001190651+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <3BA371F0.2D0BEE68@yahoo.com> (message from CBFalconer on Sat, 15
	Sep 2001 15:36:17 GMT)
Subject: Re: Weekly Mini-FAQ post for DJGPP
References: <200109100500 DOT BAA12378 AT delorie DOT com> <3BA371F0 DOT 2D0BEE68 AT yahoo DOT com>
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: CBFalconer <cbfalconer AT yahoo DOT com>
> Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
> Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2001 15:36:17 GMT
> 
> Request: list these as the actual zip filenames, possibly as a
> separate listing. That way it can be quickly compared to the
> package filenames locally available.  Example:
> 
>   binutils-2.11.2 (bnu2112b.zip), bison-1.28 (bsn129b.zip), ....

You should be able to use the files in the manifest directory to
compare the names, since the *.ver files state the versions in full.

Not that I object to adding the zip file names, but if we are going to
do that, we should probably change the format as well:

   binutils-2.11.2           bnu2112b.zip, bnu2112s.zip
   bison-1.29		     bsn129b.zip,  bsn129s.zip

etc.