Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2001 10:24:30 +0300
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: marcov AT toad DOT stack DOT nl (Marco van de Voort)
Message-Id: <9743-Sat18Aug2001102430+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <slrn9nr4o4.2jtm.marcov@toad.stack.nl>
Subject: Re: GDB
References: <001401c125ad$746f36a0$3f38c5cb AT a> <7443-Wed15Aug2001204209+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <slrn9nr4o4 DOT 2jtm DOT marcov AT toad DOT stack DOT nl>
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: marcov AT toad DOT stack DOT nl (Marco van de Voort)
> Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
> Date: 17 Aug 2001 21:54:58 GMT
> > 
> > GDB is available as an executable program on _all_ the platforms it
> > supports, including DJGPP.  There's no such thing as GDB library, and
> > you cannot produce one from the GDB distribution, on any platform.  It
> > is a long-standing goal of GDB development to provide such a library,
> > but GDB is not there yet.
> 
> 4.18 versions can be compiled to lib with a patch/makefile, and afaik from
> 5.0 it is standard.

That's not the kind of library the OP wanted.