Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 21:55:56 +0300
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: "Michael Demanet" <michaeldemanet AT brutele DOT be>
Message-Id: <3405-Thu26Jul2001215555+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <9jpmj6$q70$1@news.brutele.be> (michaeldemanet@brutele.be)
Subject: Re: C99
References:  <9jpmj6$q70$1 AT news DOT brutele DOT be>
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: "Michael Demanet" <michaeldemanet AT brutele DOT be>
> Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
> Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 20:13:24 +0200
> 
> Do you know if djgpp will support the new version of gcc (3.0) and when ?

The preliminary port of GCC 3.0 is already available in the
v2gnu/alphas directory.  It was announced here a few weeks ago.

Note that GCC 3.0 and C99 are not the same thing.  C99 requires many
changes in the standard headers and the library.  Those are developed
by the DJGPP project itself (not by GCC maintainers), and we are not
even close to supporting all of the C99 huge additions.