X-Authentication-Warning: kendall.sfbr.org: jeffw set sender to jeffw AT darwin DOT sfbr DOT org using -f Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2001 06:01:26 -0500 From: JT Williams To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: Binutils 2.11.2 released Message-ID: <20010715060126.A5109@kendall.sfbr.org> Mail-Followup-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com References: <200107061715 DOT NAA25775 AT delorie DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200107061715.NAA25775@delorie.com>; from snowball3@bigfoot.com on Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 01:02:42AM -0400 Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk -: The DJGPP port of Binutils 2.11.2 has been released. In the bnu2112b.zip archive (just to name an example; I'm pretty sure I've run into this with other archives) the following info files use indirect references into *.info-N subfiles: 2367 06-26-01 20:49 info/ld.info 9189 06-26-01 20:49 info/as.info 2541 06-26-01 20:49 info/binutils.info This one, however, has indirect references to *.iN files: 1604 06-26-01 20:49 info/gprof.info The result was that, following installation of bnu2112b (which otherwise unzips with .iN files), info worked for `gprof', but not for `ld', `as', or `binutils' until I edited the latter and changed the .info-N extension to .iN. Technically the problem seems to be an inconsistent naming of info files in this archive, but should `info' be clever enough to look for the .iN extension (at least on non-LFN systems) if the requested .info-N extension can't be found?