Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 19:59:11 +0300
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: "chris.danx" <chris DOT danx AT ntlworld DOT com>
Message-Id: <2561-Wed11Jul2001195910+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <___27.27447$B56.4729855@news2-win.server.ntlworld.com>
	(chris DOT danx AT ntlworld DOT com)
Subject: Re: Question on GPP 2.8.1 and DJGPP
References: <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1010711081652 DOT 1314F-100000 AT is> <dTX27.26235$B56 DOT 4610229 AT news2-win DOT server DOT ntlworld DOT com> <2950-Wed11Jul2001185249+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <___27.27447$B56 DOT 4729855 AT news2-win DOT server DOT ntlworld DOT com>
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: "chris.danx" <chris DOT danx AT ntlworld DOT com>
> Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
> Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 17:19:22 +0100
> 
> I meant to say that when i ran patch with djgpp.diff, i got some
> hunks that were rejected.  When i modified the file names, I got
> even more hunks rejected

I suspect that the ones rejected in the second run were those which
were applied okay in the first.  For those, Patch will usually say
that it found this patch either already applied or reversed, and will
ask whether to apply it anyway.  Answer NO (the default replies it
suggests are okay, so just hit Enter twice).