Message-ID: <3B487D65.85F67139@postmark.net> From: Jason Hood Organization: NiteRider X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en,pdf MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: Sort temp file bug? References: <3B449BBF DOT 8EA89B2A AT postmark DOT net> <7458-Thu05Jul2001211407+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 202.7.180.38 X-Original-Trace: 9 Jul 2001 01:52:50 +1000, 202.7.180.38 Lines: 20 Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2001 01:33:57 +1000 NNTP-Posting-Host: 203.12.160.33 X-Complaints-To: abuse AT telstra DOT net X-Trace: nsw.nnrp.telstra.net 994606442 203.12.160.33 (Mon, 09 Jul 2001 01:34:02 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2001 01:34:02 EST To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > From: Jason Hood > > I don't understand: what does ``looking at the binary'' mean? How do > you look at the binary and see what temporary files will it produce? I saw "sort%5d%5d" and "s%5d%2d.%3d" and made the logical conclusion. > What is the size and time stamp of sort.exe you are using? I remember > some bug around those lines in some uploaded binary distro, but I > think it was later corrected. Okay, I just checked Simtel.Net and my txt20b is a month behind. I just tested it with LFN=n and that worked okay, but DOS will wait. I expect it will work. Sigh. None out of three. :) Jason.