From: "Tom St Denis" Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp References: <993834875 DOT 150946 AT queeg DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se> <9T2%6.58175$Mf5 DOT 15484749 AT news3 DOT rdc1 DOT on DOT home DOT com> <993836344 DOT 632838 AT queeg DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se> <993837121 DOT 900276 AT queeg DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se> Subject: Re: building GCC 3.0 with DJGPP Lines: 29 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2462.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2462.0000 Message-ID: Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 18:10:17 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.112.8.23 X-Complaints-To: abuse AT home DOT net X-Trace: news3.rdc1.on.home.com 993838217 24.112.8.23 (Fri, 29 Jun 2001 11:10:17 PDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 11:10:17 PDT Organization: Excite AT Home - The Leader in Broadband http://home.com/faster To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com "Martin Str|mberg" wrote in message news:993837121 DOT 900276 AT queeg DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se... > Tom St Denis wrote: > > : I wouldn't mind putting together a big zip file collection if someone could > : point me to all the upto date files. > > Just check the dates. Usually higher numers means later, but there are > exceptions (like bnu281b and bnu211b IIRC). > > However why download this mega file, 100MiB (or what it takes), if you > only need one or two packages? Like a new bash comes along? Then you'd > need to download that megapackage again when you could get away with > 2MiB? Yes true, but once in a while I flush all of my tools and reinstall [make sure nothing creeps in]. A 100mb package would be a pain [actually all the djgpp bins I could find are 58mb, docs are another 10 to 20 mb] but much better than, download fil300b.zip, then txti31b.zip, then ... His zip-picker comes a nice way, but lacks "developer" tools and there is no gcc3-0 yet... which strikes me as odd since it was so simple to build in redhat Tom