Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 16:19:06 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Strange behavior of compiler.
In-Reply-To: <3b37e5df.287898614@news.primus.ca>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010626161749.17201K-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Graaagh the Mighty wrote:

> >stabs debugging is better because the compiler generates much more 
> >detailed info, including more detailed line number information and other 
> >important data.
> 
> And the not available/broken bit?

It's not broken more than it is on Unix.  There are known limitations 
with stabs, but they are inherent to its design, not specific to DJGPP.  
And the COFF debug limitations are much more grave.