From: Hans-Bernhard Broeker Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: Info. Date: 26 Jun 2001 09:11:40 GMT Organization: Aachen University of Technology (RWTH) Lines: 16 Message-ID: <9h9jkc$kjs$1@nets3.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE> References: <3b37e594 DOT 287824154 AT news DOT primus DOT ca> NNTP-Posting-Host: acp3bf.physik.rwth-aachen.de X-Trace: nets3.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE 993546700 21116 137.226.32.75 (26 Jun 2001 09:11:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse AT rwth-aachen DOT de NNTP-Posting-Date: 26 Jun 2001 09:11:40 GMT Originator: broeker@ To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Graaagh the Mighty wrote: > On Mon, 25 Jun 2001 15:58:48 +0300 (IDT), Eli Zaretskii > sat on a tribble, which squeaked: >>It's the same thing. The value of __DJGPP_MINOR__ *is* the minor version >>of the library, since each release of djdev comes with a new library. > That doesn't sound like something upon which it is wise to depend. The > library version and core tools version could diverge in the future, No, they almost certainly can't. They're built from one common source package (djlsr*.zip), and that's not meant to change in the foreseeable future. -- Hans-Bernhard Broeker (broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de) Even if all the snow were burnt, ashes would remain.