Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 15:56:19 +0300
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Message-Id: <2561-Sat16Jun2001155617+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
In-reply-to: <3b2b4290.163568911@news.primus.ca> (invalid@erehwon.invalid)
Subject: Re: Mysterious NaNs...
References:  <3b2b4290 DOT 163568911 AT news DOT primus DOT ca>
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: invalid AT erehwon DOT invalid (Graaagh the Mighty)
> Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
> Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 11:36:51 GMT
> 
> I suspect it may be an optimizer bug.
> There are comments in the trouble area to help explain better; these
> start "// DEBUG".

Paul, you don't really expect anyone to read 600-odd lines of
intertwined code, do you?

Since you obviousy already spent quite some time playing and debugging
this code, it would be much more efficient if you simply told what you
already know, in as much detail as you can, sparing us all the other
clutter.

Specifically, I don't understand what is the problem you are trying to
solve here.  Is it the fact that there are NaNs in your program, or
how NaNs are handled?  If the latter, it's a very messy area, and you
are in for a bumpy ride; might as well reconsider whether at all get
into that trouble.

(And yes, I did read the comments near the DEBUG markers.)