From: "Chris Wilkinson" Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: Link errors with Debug switch on Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 16:12:26 -0400 Organization: University of Maryland College Park Lines: 44 Message-ID: <9gdq8k$324$1@hecate.umd.edu> References: <000801c0f518$4cddd300$5a3e0281 AT umd DOT edu> <9791-Fri15Jun2001104543+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <9gcu73$3s7$1 AT hecate DOT umd DOT edu> <9gd57o$717$2 AT hecate DOT umd DOT edu> <2945-Fri15Jun2001185559+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <9gdipt$bjm$2 AT hecate DOT umd DOT edu> <3069-Fri15Jun2001220355+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> NNTP-Posting-Host: enme-90.umd.edu X-Trace: hecate.umd.edu 992635988 3140 129.2.62.90 (15 Jun 2001 20:13:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse AT wam DOT umd DOT edu NNTP-Posting-Date: 15 Jun 2001 20:13:08 GMT X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com "Eli Zaretskii" wrote in message news:3069-Fri15Jun2001220355+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il... > > From: "Chris Wilkinson" > > Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp > > Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 14:05:27 -0400 > > > What I'm looking for is to see whether ipmpar.o lists the function > ipmpar (symbol name "_ipmpar") with `T'. Here is the output from nm -A ipmpar.o. No -g switch. C:\FFOP\src\OneUnit>nm -A ipmpar.o ipmpar.o:000000a0 b .bss ipmpar.o:000000a0 d .data ipmpar.o:00000000 t .text ipmpar.o:00000000 t ___gnu_compiled_c ipmpar.o:000000a0 b _imach.3 ipmpar.o:00000000 T _ipmpar ipmpar.o:000000cc b _ipmpar.4 ipmpar.o:00000000 t gcc2_compiled. and here with the -g switch C:\FFOP\src\OneUnit>nm -A ipmpar.o ipmpar.o:00000000 t .bf ipmpar.o:000000a0 b .bss ipmpar.o:000000a0 d .data ipmpar.o:00000094 t .ef ipmpar.o:00000000 t .text ipmpar.o:00000000 t ___gnu_compiled_c ipmpar.o:000000a0 b _imach ipmpar.o:000000a0 b _imach.3 ipmpar.o:00000000 t _ipmpar ipmpar.o:000000cc b _ipmpar.4 ipmpar.o:00000000 t gcc2_compiled. The difference seems to be that _ipmpar is marked with a 'T' in the first case (no -g) and 't' in the second case (-g). Many thanks for your perseverance in this.