Message-ID: <5BF60CD649EDD411A04600B0D049F53A544315@hydmail02.hyd.wilco-int.com>
From: Prashant Ramachandra <rprash AT wilco-int DOT com>
To: "'djgpp AT delorie DOT com'" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
Subject: RE: continuing RHIDE problem(s), please help
Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 09:15:11 +0530
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Content-Type: text/plain
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

On Friday, May 25, 2001 3:59 AM, Cody [SMTP:cody1 AT ktsnet DOT com] wrote:
| I absolutely despise EMACS... because it's an inefficient IDE, but
| it's just
| because I have gotten so used to the RHIDE-like IDE from turbo
| pascal/turbo
| c++ etc.  I have tried other IDE's, but they just are clumsy
| compared to
| RHIDE since they don't seem to be as "integrated/adapted" for
| gcc/gpp/djgpp
| etc. (you get the picture...).

Have you tried setedit? It's an equivalent of RHIDE. I'm not sure if it has
the same problems though. I don't use setedit myself, but others who do
should be able to tell you if it works fine.
--
Prashant TR <tr AT midpec DOT com>  Web: http://www.midpec.com/

Ignore the ignorant and discover your own wisdom
- Anonymous