From: "Eric Botcazou" Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: Compiling Allegro Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 19:22:37 +0200 Lines: 19 Message-ID: <9ebit8$2kkj$1@news6.isdnet.net> References: <7263-Mon21May2001062435+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <000501c0e209$b81c0140$0700a8c0 AT chello DOT at> NNTP-Posting-Host: dyn-213-36-133-218.ppp.libertysurf.fr X-Trace: news6.isdnet.net 990465768 86675 213.36.133.218 (21 May 2001 17:22:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse AT isdnet DOT net NNTP-Posting-Date: 21 May 2001 17:22:48 GMT X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2014.211 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211 To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com > I'm using Allegro 3.12, which I believe to be the newest version. If there > is a newer version I am unable to find it. The latest WIP version is 3.9.36 at http://sourceforge.net/projects/alleg/ . Don't be afraid of the WIP (Work-In-Progress) status, the djgpp port is as stable as the old 3.12 version. > It there is none, could it have something to do with either my AMD K6-2 > Processor or with Win98SE? No, Allegro 3.12 used old asm syntax which makes Gas versions newer than 2.9.x complain. This is fixed in the latest WIPs. -- Eric Botcazou ebotcazou AT multimania DOT com