Message-ID: <000501c0e209$b81c0140$0700a8c0@chello.at>
From: "Maverick" <vhd AT chello DOT at>
To: <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
References: <Y6YN6.124299$2q DOT 4385907 AT news DOT chello DOT at> <7263-Mon21May2001062435+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Subject: Re: Compiling Allegro
Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 17:21:33 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com


----- Original Message -----
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
To: Maverick <vhd AT chello DOT at>
Cc: <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 5:24 AM
Subject: Re: Compiling Allegro


> > From: "Maverick" <vhd AT chello DOT at>
> > Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
> > Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 23:07:36 GMT
> >
> > I've used make to compile allegro as suggested by it's own readme. It
> > compiles without any errors, but I do wonder about the warnings it gives
out
> > when compling some parts :
> >
> > indirect call without '*'    <--- this shows up pretty often
> > indirect ljmp without '*'  <--- this also shows up pretty often
> > using '%ex' instead of '%ecx' due to 'w' suffix
> > using '%si' instead of '%esi' due to 'w' suffix
> > using '%al' instead of %eax' due to 'b' suffix
>
> You are using an old version of Allegro which uses inline assembly in
> invalid ways.  Upgrade to a newer version.

I'm using Allegro 3.12, which I believe to be the newest version. If there
is a newer version I am unable to find it. It there is none, could it have
something to do with either my AMD K6-2 Processor or with Win98SE?

Thx, Maverick