From: Hans-Bernhard Broeker Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: CWSDPMI question Date: 14 May 2001 09:03:37 GMT Organization: Aachen University of Technology (RWTH) Lines: 25 Message-ID: <9do719$cdm$1@nets3.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE> References: <9dnnjs$3qt$1 AT info DOT cyf-kr DOT edu DOT pl> NNTP-Posting-Host: acp3bf.physik.rwth-aachen.de X-Trace: nets3.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE 989831017 12726 137.226.32.75 (14 May 2001 09:03:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse AT rwth-aachen DOT de NNTP-Posting-Date: 14 May 2001 09:03:37 GMT Originator: broeker@ To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Rafal Maj wrote: > I'm calling small DJGPP program from autoexec, so to execute it I must run > cwsdpmi.exe before. No, you don't. Not if you have cwsdpmi in the PATH, or in the same directory that DJGPP app is in. > Then, after my program returns, the system continues loading > 'Lose98'. Is this ok ? Loading cwsdpmi (with is dos driver I think) > and then windows ? Yes, that's OK. CWSDPMI will have unloaded itself automatically after serving DPMI for one application. If it hadn't (i.e. you put it into resident mode), you'ld have noticed that, since Winblows cannot possibly boot itself with a DPMI server already present in the system. > WIll cwsdpmi decrease my memory available later under windows ? No. To see, run "mem / c" in a Windows DOS box: you'll see that there's no CWSDPMI consuming memory. -- Hans-Bernhard Broeker (broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de) Even if all the snow were burnt, ashes would remain.