Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 16:39:39 -0400
Message-Id: <200105102039.QAA24266@envy.delorie.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: envy.delorie.com: dj set sender to dj AT envy DOT delorie DOT com using -f
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <20010510214059.C297@lauras.lt>
Subject: Re: DJGPP is based on ...
References: <Pine DOT A41 DOT 4 DOT 05 DOT 10105101505140 DOT 65374-100000 AT ieva06 DOT lanet DOT lv> <200105101506 DOT LAA21712 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20010510214059 DOT C297 AT lauras DOT lt>
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


> > Perhaps we should make the gcc 3.0 test builds the default build for
> > the zip picker?  They'd get tested that way.
> 
> Throwing alpha software at end users? I must be misunderstanding something.

No, you're not.  I'm being a little sarcastic, but I can't think of
any way to test gcc 3.0 more than we're already doing so.