From: "Rafal Maj" <maj_rafal AT poczta DOT onet DOT pl>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Odp: Deleting after strdup
Date: Thu, 3 May 2001 13:47:46 +0200
Organization: Academic Computer Center CYFRONET AGH
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <9crgf3$qr5$1@info.cyf-kr.edu.pl>
References: <9crage$5td$1 AT info DOT cyf-kr DOT edu DOT pl> <9crerk$mct$1 AT nets3 DOT rz DOT RWTH-Aachen DOT DE>
NNTP-Posting-Host: d-94-53-03.cyfronet.krakow.pl
X-Trace: info.cyf-kr.edu.pl 988890403 27493 149.156.1.163 (3 May 2001 11:46:43 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news AT cyf-kr DOT edu DOT pl
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 3 May 2001 11:46:43 +0000 (UTC)
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

So  both delete s; and delete[] s; are wrong ? I know that delete is C++
style, but since char* has no destructor, I think that delete or delete[]
will work for this type same as free(). Am I right ?

Użytkownik Hans-Bernhard Broeker <broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de> w
wiadomości do grup dyskusyjnych
napisał:9crerk$mct$1 AT nets3 DOT rz DOT RWTH-Aachen DOT DE...
> Rafal Maj <maj_rafal AT poczta DOT onet DOT pl> wrote:
> > Sorry for newbie question... after char* s = strdup(...); I should use
> > delete[] s; ?
>
> No. free(s).  strdup() is a C function, not a C++ one, so it uses the
> C style of memory allocation.
>
> > or is it safe to use char *s = strdup(org); ?
>
> Read it up in the docs. If they don't say you can pass in a NULL
> without harm, then you shouldn't.
>
>
> --
> Hans-Bernhard Broeker (broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de)
> Even if all the snow were burnt, ashes would remain.