From: "Marp" <marp AT 0 DOT 0 DOT 0 DOT 0>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: Binutils 2.11 released
Date: Tue, 1 May 2001 19:36:59 -0400
Organization: MindSpring Enterprises
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <9cnh6q$olf$1@slb3.atl.mindspring.net>
References: <200104261711 DOT NAA00607 AT delorie DOT com> <9cdcdp$uqp$1 AT slb1 DOT atl DOT mindspring DOT net> <3AEF39B6 DOT 3080305 AT operamail DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 9e.fc.1f.24
X-Server-Date: 1 May 2001 23:34:50 GMT
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

"Sahab Yazdani" <sahaby AT operamail DOT com> wrote in message
news:3AEF39B6 DOT 3080305 AT operamail DOT com...

<snip>
>
> besides  I think that the first two refer to the versions of GCC,
> whereas the second two refer to the versions of Binutils?
>

No, the files on simtel clearly show older binutils with higher version
numbers than the newer ones judging by the dates of the files. We went from
a higher version number to a lower one when 2.10 was released, and it seems
to make no sense.