Sender: rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk Message-ID: <3AA81918.8DE8FBBD@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2001 23:43:20 +0000 From: Richard Dawe X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.17 i586) X-Accept-Language: de,fr MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Wojciech =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ga=B3=B1zka?= CC: libsocket Mailing List , DJGPP newsgroup , dossock Mailing List Subject: Re: libsocket and sock.vxd - anyone ? References: <13288F4408ADD11186FF0060B06A43130647E377 AT MSGWAW1> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Hello. Wojciech Gałązka wrote: > Has anyone had any experience with sock.vxd to share? > I checked the sources and the buglist and I'm going to take care of the > coda sock.vxd part of the libsocket library. I would be interested if > anyone else has been dong anything with sock.vxd. so that we could > collaborate Most of my knowledge is contained in the Coda SOCK.VXD Pseudo-documentation: http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/dl/csockvxd.htm and the libsocket source code. I did upload some modified SOCK.VXD sources to the dossock site. I tried to fix a few of the problems, but did not have much success. I made some modifications to the code to allow the same headers to be used in the VxD or software using the VxD. Anyhow the dossock site is here, with a link to the modified SOCK.VXD sources: http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/dossock/ If you have any specific questions about SOCK.VXD, I can try to answer them. > I'm not fond of the wsock2.vxd approach and the discussion of 'patching' > the binary file ... well I cannot afford this Yes, I agree, this does not seem like a very user-friendly solution. Distributing a modified version of WSOCK2.VXD is probably illegal. Bye, Rich =] -- Richard Dawe http://www.bigfoot.com/~richdawe/ "The soul is the mirror of an indestructible universe." --- Gottfried W. Leibniz