From: Cesar Rabak <csrabak AT uol DOT com DOT br>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Using MASM with DJGPP
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2001 17:54:44 -0200
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <3A71D604.4067E1C8@uol.com.br>
References: <Dchc6.1810$Jx5 DOT 65021 AT news2-win DOT server DOT ntlworld DOT com> <5137-Fri26Jan2001195157+0200-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 200-221-14-196.dsl-sp.uol.com.br (200.221.14.196)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 980538926 15949482 200.221.14.196 (16 [39218])
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com



Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> 
> 
> Perhaps you should have tried the latest Gas's option which lets it
> accept Intel-style ASM code.  Section 17.2 of the FAQ says this, so I
> wonder why didn't you try that.  Perhaps you had a stale version of
> the FAQ?
> 
I'm affraid the issue was related to the macros and other "MASMisms" and
not only the Intel syntax.