From: Stephen Silver <sasilver AT hotmail DOT com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: #include <limits>
Date: 7 Jan 2001 16:44:27 GMT
Organization: none
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <93a6db$b1s$1@newsg3.svr.pol.co.uk>
References: <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1010107142145 DOT 25836E-100000 AT is>
NNTP-Posting-Host: modem-138.blue-head-tilefish.dialup.pol.co.uk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
X-Trace: newsg3.svr.pol.co.uk 978885867 11324 62.136.235.138 (7 Jan 2001 16:44:27 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: 7 Jan 2001 16:44:27 GMT
X-Complaints-To: abuse AT theplanet DOT net
X-Newsreader: Frobozz Magic Newsreader
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

> On 7 Jan 2001, Stephen Silver wrote:
>
> > More
> > seriously, the DJGPP C headers also have this problem and no-one is
> > doing anything about it.  (I mentioned this on the DJGPP workers list
> > last month and got zero reaction, otherwise I would have offered to do
> > it myself.)
>
> Please consider doing this anyway.  Thanks in advance.

I think there first needs to be some discussion of how it should
be done, because it's not entirely straightforward and it requires
patching most of the standard C header files.  In fact I don't think
it can be done completely correctly without also replacing the
corresponding GCC <c*> headers, although a reasonable first
approximation can be obtained without doing this.

In any case, I will try again to initiate some discussion of this on the
DJGPP workers list.

Stephen