From: "Alexei A. Frounze" <dummy_addressee AT hotmail DOT com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: either I'm stupid or GCC once again has random behaviour
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2001 16:11:59 -0500
Lines: 49
Message-ID: <935d9b$90ng0$1@ID-57378.news.dfncis.de>
References: <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1010103105923 DOT 1129Q-100000 AT is> <92uvkq$88kpu$1 AT ID-57378 DOT news DOT dfncis DOT de> <92vl25$q9u$1 AT news DOT luth DOT se> <932f9m$8hcs3$1 AT ID-57378 DOT news DOT dfncis DOT de> <932fii$4j2$1 AT news DOT luth DOT se> <932ggh$8h5r3$1 AT ID-57378 DOT news DOT dfncis DOT de> <200101041854 DOT NAA24279 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <932ou0$8t8ce$1 AT ID-57378 DOT news DOT dfncis DOT de> <2561-Thu04Jan2001235404+0200-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <932u4l$908tn$1 AT ID-57378 DOT news DOT dfncis DOT de> <2593-Fri05Jan2001121313+0200-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
NNTP-Posting-Host: nas-204-59.rochester.navipath.net (64.20.204.59)
X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 978729069 9461248 64.20.204.59 (16 [57378])
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> wrote in message
news:2593-Fri05Jan2001121313+0200-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il...
> > From: "Alexei A. Frounze" <dummy_addressee AT hotmail DOT com>
> > Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
> > Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2001 17:41:06 -0500
> >
> > Why the h***  "h***" is filtered out but g0d is n0t? Isn't this a
> > discrimination after all? why g0d is better and less offensive than
h***? is
> > there a proof? Btw, if we have a word which assumes existance of the
> > opposite meaning, we can suppress use of either of these words.
>
> That's a wrong attitude.  Please accept that it is offensive as an
> axiom, and refrain from using it.  DJ's spam filter is very good, it
> is constantly improved and maintained, and chances that it will be
> changed given questions of the ``why not?'' type are less than slim.
>
> There's enough ways to express anything you want without using this,
> or other similar words.
>
> Morover, when you choose words carefully, you might also find a better
> way of saying what you need to tell.

Accepted (since there is no way to change anything).

> > You know, when a parent doesn't buy to his/her child an expensive toy it
can
> > be treatead (from child's point of view) as an insult and can be carried
out
> > without much saying about it. :)
>
> How many children do you have?  That's not how _my_ kids react when I
> don't buy them something they want.

Yours are probably grown enough to understand the issue... Otherwise it
hurts w/o any words :)

Take care,
--
Alexei A. Frounze
alexfru [AT] chat [DOT] ru
frounze [AT] ece [DOT] rochester [DOT] edu
http://alexfru.chat.ru
http://members.xoom.com/alexfru/
http://welcome.to/pmode/