From: Greg Thomas Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: Async COM managing Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2001 14:59:33 +0000 Organization: None Lines: 20 Message-ID: References: <9250eb$a84$00$1 AT news DOT t-online DOT com> NNTP-Posting-Host: bt772568.btlabs.bt.co.uk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: pheidippides.axion.bt.co.uk 978706888 9555 132.146.59.26 (5 Jan 2001 15:01:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: postmaster AT axion DOT bt DOT co DOT uk NNTP-Posting-Date: 5 Jan 2001 15:01:28 GMT X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com On Sun, 24 Dec 2000 15:18:09 +0100, "Peter Remmers" wrote in article <9250eb$a84$00$1 AT news DOT t-online DOT com>: >This must be a mistake, since it is not possible. ["it" being the releasing of a COM port after use from a DOS box]. At the risk of prolonging the debate, I wonder if it would be possible to write a library that would allow you to call the Windows functions to access the COM ports (cf libsocket for accessing the Windows Winsock functions at http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/lsck/lsck.htm) thus enabling a DOS box to use the Windows functions in a similar manner as Windows programs. Greg -- This post represents the views of the author and does not necessarily accurately represent the views of BT.